SPY BULL · QQQ BULL · 48% ABOVE THEIR 20-DAY AVERAGE
Institutional-grade reasoning, priced for one person.
Three engines score every ticker independently. Fusion reconciles them and writes the argument — direction, the setup, evidence, risk, levels. No black box, no signal group, no guessing.
Four engines — tap one
Reads every article that crosses our feeds for a ticker, ranks them by relevance and source weight, and feeds the top 50 into the score — then names the ones that actually moved it.
AI reads the language · fixed formulas produce the number · 10 min market hours, 15 min off-hours
No card charged during the trial · cancel in one click
150+
tickers under
continuous read
Top 50
ranked from every
article, per ticker
10 min
refresh during
market hours
Try it — pick a ticker
canonical read · Sep 22 close
AAPLApple Inc.
$339.75+0.23%
BULLISH
Setup: Momentum extended Evidence: Adequate Support
News
NEUTRAL+0.04
Technical
BULLISH+0.64
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral
How Fusion resolved it
AAPL: Technical analysis points bullish. News is present but not directional (50 articles, fresh). Assessment is primarily TA-driven — news confirmation would strengthen conviction.
NewsApple is on track to reach a $5 trillion market cap, reflecting strong investor confidence ahead of the iPhone Duo release. · The company is debuting Apple Pay in India, signaling potential growth in a new market.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
Informational only, not financial advice · sample read from the last close
What you actually get
Six things per ticker, every trading day.
Not a score. Not an alert. A short written assessment you can argue with — which means you can also verify it.
AAPLApple Inc.
$339.75 +0.23%
01BULLISH02Setup: Momentum extended03Evidence: Adequate Support
04 News
NEUTRAL+0.04
Technical
BULLISH+0.64
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral
05 Synthesis
AAPL: Technical analysis points bullish. News is present but not directional (50 articles, fresh). Assessment is primarily TA-driven — news confirmation would strengthen conviction.
06 Risk & levels
Risk note and the exact level that would break this read — printed on the card, before the fact.
01
Direction
Five core states from Strong Bullish to Strong Bearish, plus explicit at-risk flags — never a price target, never a recommendation.
02
The setup, named
Trend continuation, Trend reversal risk, Momentum extended, Awaiting setup. The engine names the structure it thinks the stock is in — not just which way it leans.
03
Evidence support
How much data is actually behind the call — layer availability, freshness, cross-layer alignment. Not a probability.
04
Each engine's own score
News, Technical and Crowd shown separately, so you can see where the call came from — and where it didn't.
05
Written synthesis
Plain English on how the conflict was resolved and which layer led. This is the part no chart gives you.
06
Risk note & levels to watch
What would break this read, and the specific prices at which it breaks. Stated before the fact, not after.
The case for Omnisc, in one screen
When the news and the chart disagree, what decides?
This is the moment every other tool leaves you alone. A chart won't read the contracts. A news feed won't check the trend. A chatbot will confidently pick one and forget it tomorrow. Omnisc has a stated rule, applies it the same way every day, and shows you the arithmetic.
News
Articles ranked by relevance, source weight and impact — a bounded modifier that can shade a call, never flip it.
Technicals
Price structure sets the base direction under a stated rule. Trends, ranges and breaks are scored independently of the news feed.
Crowd
Attention and sentiment sit beside the call as context — deliberately given zero weight in the score.
Fusion resolves it
FUSION
Technicals set the base direction — that is a stated rule, not a preference. News is a bounded modifier: it can shade a call, never flip it, and it is deliberately asymmetric because bearish news moves price harder than bullish news. Crowd is context and never touches the score.
When the layers disagree, Fusion applies the same rule every day and states the disagreement on the card. The level that would prove it wrong is printed on the card before the fact, not after.
TA · base directionNews · bounded modifierCrowd · context onlySame rule · every session
What it replaces
Seven tabs open. Still no answer.
The work isn't finding information — it's triaging it. Which of today's articles actually matter for this ticker? Omnisc reads all of them and answers that before you sit down, for all 150+.
Chart · RSI, trend, support, resistance6 min
Today's headlines · which ones move price?9 min
X / Reddit sentiment scroll4 min
Ask a chatbot · can't be reproduced3 min
Conclusion: still not sureper ticker
With Omnisc · about 40 seconds
01
Open the dashboard. Every ticker already carries its direction, its setup and its freshness.
02
Sort by the Fusion column. Read the rows where the engines actually disagree.
03
Open one. The synthesis already names the drivers, the risk and the level that breaks it.
04
Decide. That last step is still yours — deliberately.
Omnisc doesn't give you more information. It gives you the same information already triaged, with the reasoning attached — which is the only part that was ever slow.
Under the hood
Four engines. Each one auditable on its own.
AI extracts structure from language. Deterministic math produces every number. That split is the whole reason a score can be re-derived tomorrow and come out the same.
News Impact
Reads every article that crosses our news feeds for a ticker, ranks them, and feeds the top 50 into the aggregate score. An AI model extracts catalyst type, evidence strength and key facts — deterministic formulas turn them into a number.
Spillover detection. A TSMC article scores NVDA too, routed through a sector affinity matrix. Most tools miss this entirely.
Technical Analysis
Fully quantitative, zero AI. RSI, trend, support and resistance, Bollinger structure, catalyst readiness — computed, not interpreted.
Regime-aware. The same setup reads differently in a bull, bear, sideways or crash regime, and the engine adjusts instead of pretending regime doesn't exist.
Crowd Focus
Attention and sentiment from X, measured — never modeled. It tells you whether a move is already crowded.
Zero weight, on purpose. Crowd sits beside the assessment and never moves the score. Retail sentiment is information, not a signal.
Fusion
Reconciles all three under one fixed rule set and writes the argument in plain English — direction, the setup, evidence, drivers, risk, levels.
One page, no jargon tax. If Fusion can't explain a call in a paragraph, the call doesn't ship.
On accuracy — the honest version
Every assessment Omnisc has ever produced is logged, timestamped, versioned against the engine build that made it, and tracked through forward windows against what the market actually did.
We are not publishing a hit-rate number yet. The Technical engine is mid-recalibration, and a figure measured against a build we're replacing would be marketing, not evidence. When calibration closes, the number goes here — with the sample size and the window next to it.
Refresh schedule you can check
News Impact10 min market hours · 15 min off-hours
Technical Analysisdaily, after 4:00 PM ET
Crowd Focusevery 3 hours
Fusionseveral times per trading day
Every card carries a freshness badge, so you always know which of these last ran.
Where it sits
You probably already pay for three of these.
Omnisc doesn't replace your charting package and doesn't try to. It replaces the hour you spend turning four sources into one opinion.
Omnisc
TradingView
Yahoo Finance
Bloomberg Terminal
ChatGPT
A directional call per ticker, without you building it
Yes
You build it
No
You build it
Improvised
Written reasoning: drivers, risk, levels
Every read
—
—
Analyst notes
Unverifiable
News scored per ticker, not just listed
~50/day
—
Headlines only
Yes
No live feed
Cross-company spillover detection
Yes
—
—
Partly
—
Regime-aware technicals
Yes
Manual
—
Yes
—
Same inputs give the same score tomorrow
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes
No
Best-in-class charting
No
Yes
Basic
Yes
—
Typical retail cost
$9.99/mo
from $14.95/mo
free – $34.99/mo
~$2,000+/mo
$20/mo
Competitor pricing is indicative of publicly listed retail plans and changes without notice. Comparison reflects how each tool is typically used by an individual investor, not a feature-by-feature audit.
Where we stop
Four things Omnisc will never do.
A tool that claims no limits is telling you its limits are undocumented. Ours are on the marketing page, which is the only place they count.
Tell you to buy or sell
Omnisc produces direction plus arguments. The position is your decision, and legally it has to be — we are not a registered adviser or broker-dealer.
Predict a price
No targets, no probabilities dressed up as confidence. Evidence support describes how much data stands behind a read — nothing more.
Hide how a number was made
Every score decomposes into inputs you can see. If a read looks wrong to you, you can find out exactly where you disagree with it.
Cover everything
150+ curated tickers across AI & Tech, Defense and Materials — chosen because news actually moves them. Coverage grows deliberately, not by crawling everything.
Background in data analytics, AI/ML and business intelligence. Every engine, the Fusion layer, the infrastructure and this page were built directly — which means there is exactly one person to hold responsible for a bad read.
Support replies come from the person who wrote the code, and the roadmap is public.
Runs brand, content and distribution — everything you read about Omnisc outside the app. She doesn't touch the scoring rules.
Money and paperwork
OMNISC LLC
Wyoming, US · Entity ID 2026-001884768
Merchant of Record
Lemon Squeezy for EU/EEA/UK · Stripe elsewhere
Card security
PCI DSS Level 1 via processors · SSL throughout
Cancelling
One click in-app · annual refundable 14 days
Infrastructure & roadmap
Running on Google Cloud as part of the Google for Startups Cloud Program portfolio. Live in Early Access since April 2026.
NowTechnical recalibration — the published accuracy figure goes live when it closes
2026Options flow layer: implied volatility, Greeks and positioning enter the evidence set
2027SEC filings layer, 200+ coverage, ML confidence calibration, Copilot
Roadmap items are directional and may change.
What it costs
One plan. Everything in it. No tiers.
There is no Pro version holding the good engine hostage. Every account gets all 150+ tickers, all four engines, the full written reasoning and the Intelligence Feed from day one.
✓
7 days free — card saved, nothing charged
✓
Cancel in one click, from inside the app
✓
Annual plans fully refundable for 14 days after the first charge
Monthly
$9.99
per month, after the trial
Full coverage, all four engines, the written reasoning — nothing held back for a higher tier.
Direction and arguments. We explain — we don't predict.
Open the trial, pick the tickers you actually hold, and read what each engine sees. If the reasoning doesn't convince you, cancel before day seven and pay nothing.
No card charged during the trial · cancel in one click
The resolved read — swipe any ticker
sample
AAPL+0.23%
$339.75 · Momentum extended Evidence: Adequate Support
BULLISH
News
NEUTRAL+0.04
Technical
BULLISH+0.64
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
AAPL: Technical analysis points bullish. News is present but not directional (50 articles, fresh). Assessment is primarily TA-driven — news confirmation would strengthen conviction.
NewsApple is on track to reach a $5 trillion market cap, reflecting strong investor confidence ahead of the iPhone Duo release. · The company is debuting Apple Pay in India, signaling potential growth in a new market.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
$184.99 · Trend continuation Evidence: Adequate Support
BULLISH
News
NEUTRAL+0.10
Technical
BULLISH+0.63
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
PLTR: Technical analysis points bullish. News is present but not directional (50 articles, fresh). Assessment is primarily TA-driven — news confirmation would strengthen conviction.
NewsPalantir reported a significant 110% surge in commercial revenue for Q2, indicating strong demand and growth potential. · Concerns over regulatory challenges and potential nationalization of AI labs may weigh on short-term investor confidence.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
$228.87 · Trend continuation Evidence: Adequate Support
BULLISH
News
NEUTRAL+0.02
Technical
BULLISH+0.66
Crowd
Normal · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
NVDA: Technical analysis points bullish. News is present but not directional (50 articles, fresh). Assessment is primarily TA-driven — news confirmation would strengthen conviction.
What each engine sees
TABullish trend · Strong uptrend · Upper 52-week range (89%)
NewsNvidia's stock is experiencing positive sentiment due to Apple's recent moves in AI, which may indicate a competitive landscape that could benefit Nvidia. · Concerns from prominent investors about the concentration of AI revenue among a few companies, including Nvidia, could create short-term volatility and impact investor confidence.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
$378.90 · Trend reversal risk Evidence: Adequate Support
BEARISH
News
NEUTRAL+0.01
Technical
BEARISH−0.28
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
TSLA: No strong directional indication. Technical contribution is neutral after setup adjustment (+0.00), news flow is non-directional. Waiting for catalyst or technical breakout.
NewsTesla is facing a civil rights trial and a high-stakes court fight in California, which could create uncertainty and negatively impact investor sentiment in the short term. · Concerns about delayed revenue from the Optimus robot and competition from Saudi Arabia are weighing on the stock.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
$190.99 · Trend reversal risk Evidence: Adequate Support
BEARISH
News
NEUTRAL+0.06
Technical
BEARISH−0.26
Crowd
Elevated · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
RTX: No strong directional indication. Technical contribution is neutral after setup adjustment (+0.00), news flow is non-directional. Waiting for catalyst or technical breakout.
NewsRTX's strong $289 billion backlog highlights robust demand in the aerospace and defense sectors, which could support short-term growth. · Recent commentary from analysts suggests RTX may be undervalued, potentially attracting investor interest despite concerns over valuation pressures.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
$74.35 · Trend continuation Evidence: Limited Support
BULLISH
News
BULLISH+0.18
Technical
BULLISH+0.63
Crowd
High · Neutral0 wt
How Fusion resolved it
FCX: Technical structure and news flow align bullish. Both independent layers point to upside with 5 supporting articles.
What each engine sees
TABullish trend · Strong uptrend · Upper 52-week range (87%)
NewsFreeport-McMoRan has recently outperformed market returns, indicating strong investor confidence and positive sentiment around the stock. · The company's low-cost production strategy positions it well to capitalize on record copper prices, suggesting potential for increased profitability and attracting short-term investor interest.
Risk note
Risk note — the condition that would invalidate this read.
Watch for
Watch for — the levels and catalysts tracked for this ticker.
Risk note, watch-for levels and the full engine breakdown open with the trial
Reads every article that crosses our feeds for a ticker, ranks them by relevance and source weight, and feeds the top 50 into the score — then names the ones that actually moved it.
AI reads the language · fixed formulas produce the number · 10 min market hours
150+
tickers under
continuous read
Top 50
ranked from every
article, per ticker
10 min
refresh during
market hours
The case for Omnisc, in one screen
When the news and the chart disagree, what decides?
This is the moment every other tool leaves you alone. A chart won't read the contracts. A news feed won't check the trend. A chatbot will confidently pick one and forget it tomorrow. Omnisc has a stated rule, applies it the same way every day, and shows you the arithmetic.
News
Articles ranked by relevance, source weight and impact — a bounded modifier that can shade a call, never flip it.
Technicals
Price structure sets the base direction under a stated rule. Trends, ranges and breaks are scored independently of the news feed.
Crowd
Attention and sentiment sit beside the call as context — deliberately given zero weight in the score.
Fusion resolves it
FUSION
Technicals set the base direction — that is a stated rule, not a preference. News is a bounded modifier: it can shade a call, never flip it, and it is deliberately asymmetric because bearish news moves price harder than bullish news. Crowd is context and never touches the score.
When the layers disagree, Fusion applies the same rule every day and states the disagreement on the card. The level that would prove it wrong is printed on the card before the fact, not after.
TA · base directionNews · bounded modifierCrowd · context onlySame rule · every session
What it replaces
Seven tabs open. Still no answer.
The work isn't finding information — it's triaging it. Omnisc reads all of it and answers before you sit down, for all 150+ tickers.
Chart: RSI, trend, levels6 min
News: which headlines matter?9 min
X / Reddit sentiment scroll4 min
Chatbot: not reproducible3 min
Conclusion: still not sureper ticker
With Omnisc · about 40 seconds
01
Open the dashboard. Every ticker already carries its direction, its setup and its freshness.
02
Sort by the Fusion column. Read the rows where the engines actually disagree.
03
Open one. The synthesis already names the drivers, the risk and the level that breaks it.
04
Decide. That last step is still yours — deliberately.
Not more information. The same information already triaged, with the reasoning attached — the only part that was ever slow.
What you actually get
Six things per ticker, every trading day.
Not a score. Not an alert. A short written assessment you can argue with — which means you can also verify it.
01
Direction
Five core states from Strong Bullish to Strong Bearish, plus explicit at-risk flags — never a price target, never a recommendation.
02
The setup, named
Trend continuation, Trend reversal risk, Momentum extended, Awaiting setup. The engine names the structure it thinks the stock is in — not just which way it leans.
03
Evidence support
How much data is actually behind the call — layer availability, freshness, cross-layer alignment. Not a probability.
04
Each engine's own score
News, Technical and Crowd shown separately, so you can see where the call came from — and where it didn't.
05
Written synthesis
Plain English on how the conflict was resolved and which layer led. This is the part no chart gives you.
06
Risk note & levels
What would break this read, and the specific prices at which it breaks. Stated before the fact, not after.
Under the hood
Four engines. Each one auditable on its own.
AI extracts structure from language. Deterministic math produces every number. That split is why a score can be re-derived tomorrow and come out the same.
News Impact
Reads every article that crosses our feeds for a ticker, ranks them, and feeds the top 50 into the aggregate score. AI extracts catalyst type and evidence strength — deterministic formulas turn them into a number.
Spillover detection. A TSMC article scores NVDA too, routed through a sector affinity matrix.
Technical Analysis
Fully quantitative, zero AI. RSI, trend, support and resistance, Bollinger structure, catalyst readiness — computed, not interpreted.
Regime-aware. The same setup reads differently in a bull, bear, sideways or crash regime.
Crowd Focus
Attention and sentiment from X, measured — never modeled. It tells you whether a move is already crowded.
Zero weight, on purpose. Retail sentiment is information, not a signal.
Fusion
Reconciles all three under one fixed rule set and writes the argument in plain English — direction, the setup, evidence, drivers, risk, levels.
One page, no jargon tax. If Fusion can't explain a call in a paragraph, the call doesn't ship.
On accuracy — the honest version
Every assessment Omnisc has ever produced is logged, timestamped, versioned against the engine build that made it, and tracked against what the market actually did.
We are not publishing a hit-rate number yet. A figure measured against a build we're replacing would be marketing, not evidence. When calibration closes, the number goes here — with the sample size next to it.
Refresh schedule you can check
News Impact10 min market hours · 15 min off-hours
Technicaldaily, after 4:00 PM ET
Crowd Focusevery 3 hours
Fusionseveral times per trading day
Every card carries a freshness badge, so you always know which of these last ran.
Where it sits
You probably already pay for three of these.
Omnisc doesn't replace your charting package. It replaces the hour you spend turning four sources into one opinion.
Omnisc
TradingView
A directional call per ticker, without you building it
Yes
You build it
Written reasoning: drivers, risk, levels
Every read
—
News scored per ticker, not just listed
~50/day
—
Cross-company spillover detection
Yes
—
Regime-aware technicals
Yes
Manual
Same inputs give the same score tomorrow
Yes
Yes
Best-in-class charting
No
Yes
Typical retail cost
$9.99/mo
from $14.95/mo
Omnisc
Yahoo Finance
A directional call per ticker, without you building it
Yes
No
Written reasoning: drivers, risk, levels
Every read
—
News scored per ticker, not just listed
~50/day
Headlines only
Cross-company spillover detection
Yes
—
Regime-aware technicals
Yes
—
Same inputs give the same score tomorrow
Yes
n/a
Best-in-class charting
No
Basic
Typical retail cost
$9.99/mo
free – $34.99/mo
Omnisc
Bloomberg
A directional call per ticker, without you building it
Yes
You build it
Written reasoning: drivers, risk, levels
Every read
Analyst notes
News scored per ticker, not just listed
~50/day
Yes
Cross-company spillover detection
Yes
Partly
Regime-aware technicals
Yes
Yes
Same inputs give the same score tomorrow
Yes
Yes
Best-in-class charting
No
Yes
Typical retail cost
$9.99/mo
~$2,000+/mo
Omnisc
ChatGPT
A directional call per ticker, without you building it
Yes
Improvised
Written reasoning: drivers, risk, levels
Every read
Unverifiable
News scored per ticker, not just listed
~50/day
No live feed
Cross-company spillover detection
Yes
—
Regime-aware technicals
Yes
—
Same inputs give the same score tomorrow
Yes
No
Best-in-class charting
No
—
Typical retail cost
$9.99/mo
$20/mo
Competitor pricing is indicative of publicly listed retail plans and changes without notice.
Where we stop
Four things Omnisc will never do.
A tool that claims no limits is telling you its limits are undocumented. Ours are on the marketing page, which is the only place they count.
Tell you to buy or sell
Omnisc produces direction plus arguments. The position is your decision, and legally it has to be — we are not a registered adviser or broker-dealer.
Predict a price
No targets, no probabilities dressed up as confidence. Evidence support describes how much data stands behind a read — nothing more.
Hide how a number was made
Every score decomposes into inputs you can see. If a read looks wrong to you, you can find out exactly where you disagree with it.
Cover everything
150+ curated tickers across AI & Tech, Defense and Materials — chosen because news actually moves them.
Background in data analytics, AI/ML and business intelligence. Every engine, the Fusion layer and the infrastructure were built directly — which means there is exactly one person to hold responsible for a bad read.
Support replies come from the person who wrote the code, and the roadmap is public.
Direction and arguments. We explain — we don't predict.
Open the trial, pick the tickers you actually hold, and read what each engine sees. If the reasoning doesn't convince you, cancel before day seven and pay nothing.